「轉載」科學家再度揭穿舊約聖經的謊言
| « 1 | < | > | 2 » |
我插耶稣同你隻孽畜beebeechan就会「好得閒」！ 我又搬！吹咩 The Bible is Fiction: A Collection Of Evidence 聖經是虛構的：證據收集 https://danielmiessler.com/blog/the-bible-is-fiction-a-collection-of-evidence/?fbclid=IwAR2jPGzgWWMUCeaemxAAYLmawQ0sGKZtROMmmkbF1EL_BSfzuLCV0v8Lnlw Similarities to Other Stories The similarities between the stories and characters in the Bible and those from previous mythologies are both undeniable and well-documented. This would be obvious if it weren’t for the early indoctrination of these beliefs into children, which usually makes them unassailable as adults. In this short piece, I’ll attempt to show extraordinary similarities with regard to two of the most important Biblical narratives: the genesis story and the character of jesus christ. The Book of Genesis’s Flood Story Mirrors The Epic Of Gilgamesh From Hundreds Of Years Earlier Here are a number of elements that both Gilgamesh and the flood story in Genesis share: God decided to send a worldwide flood. This would drown men, women, children, babies, and infants, as well as eliminate all of the land animals and birds. God knew of one righteous man, Ut-Napishtim or Noah. God ordered the hero to build a multi-story wooden ark (called a chest or box in the original Hebrew), and the hero initially complained about the assignment to build the boat. The ark would have many compartments, a single door, be sealed with pitch, and would house two of every animal species. A great rain covered the land with water. The ark landed on a mountain in the Middle East. The first two birds returned to the ark. The third bird apparently found dry land because it did not return. The hero and his family left the ark, ritually killed an animal, offered it as a sacrifice. The Babylonian gods seemed genuinely sorry for the genocide that they had created. The God of Noah appears to have regretted his actions as well because he promised never to do it again. Keep in mind the level of detail in these similarities. It’s not a matter of just a flood, but specific details: three birds sent out, resisting the call to build the ark, and a single man being chosen by God to build the ark. Then consider that the first story (Gilgamesh) came from Babylon — hundreds of years before the Bible was even written. Do you honestly think, based on the similarities above, that those who wrote the Genesis story had not heard the Gilgamesh story? And if they had heard it, and they were simply rehashing an old, very popular tale, what does that say about the Bible? Jesus’s Story is an Obvious Rehashing Of Numerous Previous Characters Perhaps even more compelling is the story of Christ himself. As it turns out it’s not even remotely original. It is instead nothing more than a collection of bits and pieces from dozens of other stories that came long before. Here are some examples. Related the best Christians are extremists Asklepios healed the sick, raised the dead, and was known as the savior and redeemer. Hercules was born of a divine father and mortal mother and was known as the savior of the world. Dionysus was literally the “Son of God”, was born of a woman who had not had sex with a man, and was depicted riding a donkey. He was a traveling teacher who performed miracles and was killed and resurrected, after which time he became immortal. ........ . | |||||
除咗搬搬擡擡, 擔擔托托, 你都無乜野曉哩 | |||||
| |||||
我就比較忙啲 我都係利用坐係馬桶上大便時順便回下你咋 對你, 我只能分配到屙屎既時段俾你 | |||||
你一面㢌屎，又一面又要食番你自己的屎，當然會比較忙啲。 一面㢌屎，手又唔停咁拎番你自己的屎放落你beebeechan自己個口裡，天天如是，的確了不起的食屎佬beebeechan！ . |
| « 1 | < | > | 2 » |